Saturday, July 25, 2015

Miracles Of God and Satan Continue On

Miracles Of God and Satan Continue On

Miracles of God and the devil, do and have occurred! That should be common knowledge, but too few know the important Biblical details and ramifications of such. Because people don't, they get lethally deceived. We also need to know how to tell miracles of God from Satanic miracles.
Click To Learn How To TEST All Miracles

Satanic Miracles - Past and Future

devil deceivesWhen one reads through the book of Revelation, he can easily see that the terminal generation of this age will see and/or personally experience the effects of war, famine, martyrdom, gross sin and deceit through Satanic miracles! Unfortunately, many in our day don't recognize thatmiracles do come through two supernatural sources -- God and the devil! In the book of Exodus, we learn that some of God's miracleswere duplicated by Satan's power channeled through the Egyptian sorcerers -- a wooden staff became a snake (7:10,11); water was changed into blood (7:20-22) and frogs came out of the water and covered the land (8:6,7)! Demons can and do perform miraculous signs (Rev. 16:14). To be specific, we can be sure that our generation, if it is the last generation, will hear of or see in the future fire coming down from Heaven to earth (Rev. 13:13) and an image of the Antichrist speaking (Rev. 13:15) because of Satanic power! In fact, it will be because of such Satanic miracles that the ones who receive the infamous mark of the beast in the bible and worship his image will be deceived (Rev. 19:20). [Please read and circle that verse in your own Bible for yourself.] They will be deceived by astounding and awe-inspiring miracles produced by Satanic power! See also 2 Thess. 2:9,10.


More Satanic Miracles From The Past

Satan has in the past, is now and will continue in the future to use miracles to deceive. This truth is the answer to the mystic questions regarding Edgar Cayce, Padre Pio, etc. who carried conflicting messages about God and the afterlife along with their signs and miracles. Similar conflicting messages surrounding miracles and visions are found in a comparison of Mormonism and Catholicism. For example, AFTER prayer, the Mormons were saved by sea gulls which ate the crickets that were eating their grain in Brigham Young's day [Truth Restored by Gordon B. Hinckley, 1979, pp. 106-108]. In contrast, the Catholic church endorsed with the highest honors the 1917 Fatima visions of a personage claiming to be the Virgin Mary, which declared herself as our "refuge" and "the way that will lead you to God." Such is in direct conflict with Jn. 14:6 which declares Jesus as the only "way" to GodSince Mormonism and Catholicism both have miracles and visions and their messages about salvation are in conflict with each other, we logically know that God can't be the only power source for these miracles and visions. We can be dogmatic, since God is not a God of confusion. [God's power was NOT active in either of these cases!]

How To Tell God's Miracles From Satanic Miracles

Click To Learn More About Religious Deception
What then must we gauge all messages and teachings by, since miracles, visions, signs, etc. can be deceptive? The criterion is God's word (2 Tim. 3:16,17). If God's word isn't considered as FINAL AUTHORITY when "testing" a miracle, vision, dream, prophecy, teaching, etc., one will probably be deceived and could possibly lose his soul! Did you know that if you are deceived by a miracle to receive the mark of the beast, YOU will end up in Hell, even if you were once saved (Rev. 14:9-12)? We MUST be both "self-controlled" and "alert" to stand against the devil and his wiles (1 Pet 5:8; Eph. 6:10,11). To reflect upon the contents of this message until an indelible impression is made upon your mind might make a difference in your eternity beyond the grave! Remember, these are perilous days that call for discernment. In conclusion, God still performs miracles in our day (Jn.14:12; Acts 4:30; etc.), but so does the devil (Rev. 16:14)! The Bible is final authority and will help us distinguish the dangerous and deceptive Satanic miracles frommiracles of God.


Gods Miracles satanic miracles
OTHER TOPICS:
False Prophets and False Teachers
Plan Of Salvation
Prepare For Death
Near Death Experiences



Contact Us Or Join Our Internet Church
Evangelical OutreachPO Box 265
Washington, PA 15301


www.EvangelicalOutreach.org
www.EternalLifeBlog.com

Wednesday, July 22, 2015

What did Jesus really say to the criminal at the cross? - Anastasios Kioulachoglou

What did Jesus really say to the criminal at the cross?

Another passage that is used to support the doctrine of living immediately after death is what the Lord Jesus Christ said to the repented criminal that was crucified with him.
Luke 23:42-43
“Then he said to Jesus, "Lord, remember me when you come into your kingdom." And Jesus said to him, "Assuredly, I say to you, today you will be with me in Paradise."
So people get verse 43 and say “you see: the dead criminal was that day with Jesus in Paradise”. However, when you try to understand a passage you have to take all the other passages into consideration. And as we have extensively covered in the article “Resurrection or life immediately after death” the great hope of the Christian is not death but the resurrection. Resurrection is the main thread in the word of God when it comes to life after death. Here is what happens in the above given passage: the ancient Greek text had no commas and no points of punctuation. This is not an assumption. It is a FACT! In other words the passage reads the way it reads because the translators decided to put a comma before the word “today”, thus making Jesus appear as promising to the criminal that despite the fact that he would not have been resurrected, he would be that very day with Jesus in paradise. But such an interpretation is we believe false on two grounds that we explain below.

“And so we shall always be with the Lord”

The Word very clearly says that to be with the Lord we need resurrection! You do not “go to be with the Lord” when you die. You will be with the Lord when he returns and you are resurrected. Indeed 1 Thessalonians 4:16-17 says:
1 Thessalonians 4:16-17
“"For the Lord himself will descend from heaven with a cry of command, with the voice of an archangel, and with the sound of the trumpet of God. And the dead in Christ will rise first.Then we who are alive, who are left, will be caught up together with them in the clouds to meet the Lord in the air, and so we shall always be with the Lord."”
How we SHALL (in the future) always be with the Lord? Through resurrection! There is no other way! Unless we are ready to accept that Jesus was playing favors and for that particular criminal the Word of God didn’t apply and he didn’t need resurrection to be with the Lord, then it is obvious that the traditional interpretation is faulty. Furthermore, as Paul says in 1 Corinthians 15:51-55:
“Behold! I tell you a mystery. We shall not all sleep, but we shall all be changed, in a moment, in the twinkling of an eye, at the last trumpet. For the trumpet will sound, and the dead will be raised imperishable, and we shall be changed. For this perishable body must put on the imperishable, and this mortal body must put on immortality. When the perishable puts on the imperishable, and the mortal puts on immortality, then shall come to pass the saying that is written: "Death is swallowed up in victory." “O death, where is your victory? O death, where is your sting?"
To be immortal you must put on immortality, and this will only happen at the last trumpet, at the coming of the Lord. If after death you were already immortal, then why on earth would you need to put on again immortality?! Also the Lord said:
John 5:25-29
“"Truly, truly, I say to you, an hour is coming, and is now here, when the dead will hear the voice of the Son of God, and those who hear will live. For as the Father has life in himself, so he has granted the Son also to have life in himself. And he has given him authority to execute judgment, because he is the Son of Man. Do not marvel at this, for an hour is coming when all who are in the tombs will hear his voice and come out, those who have done good to the resurrection of life, and those who have done evil to the resurrection of judgment.”
Do the dead live now? According to the Lord, NO! That’s why he uses future tense in what He says: “an hour is coming, and is now here, when the dead will hear the voice of the Son of God, and those who hear will live”. The dead are not living now. They WILL live in that day, when “when all who are in the tombs will [future] hear his voice and come out, those who have done good to the resurrection of life, and those who have done evil to the resurrection of judgment”
Jesus Himself died and had to be resurrected 3 days after. As Paul said quoting David:
Acts 13:34-37
“And as for the fact that he raised him from the dead, no more to return to corruption, he has spoken in this way, "'I will give you the holy and sure blessings of David.' Therefore he says also in another psalm, "'You will not let your Holy One see corruption.' For David, after he had served the purpose of God in his own generation, fell asleep and was laid with his fathers and saw corruption, but he whom God raised up did not see corruption.
Had Jesus not been raised from the dead He would indeed have seen corruption. Jesus obviously was not in paradise (which is something still future) that day but in the tomb. He could therefore in no way issue a promise to the criminal that that very day he would be with him in Paradise.

What and where is “paradise”?

The second reason this interpretation is faulty is because Jesus’ promise was about the paradise. When He spoke about it, He was answering to the request of the criminal, who said:
Luke 23:42
“Jesus, remember me when you come into your kingdom.”
He obviously had heard about the coming Kingdom of God. This was the constant theme of Jesus’ teaching. So he knew this teaching. Therefore when Jesus replied to him, he replied on this request. Many get confused because of the tradition that interprets “paradise” as a place in heaven where the good ones go after their death. But paradise is nothing like this! To find the true meaning of paradise we need to look not into human interpretations but into the Word of God. And this Word leaves no place for doubts. In Revelation 2:7 we hear Jesus giving the following promise:
“To the one who conquers I will grant to eat of the tree of life, which is in the paradise of God.'”
So the tree of life is in the paradise of God. The next reference to the tree of life is in Revelation 22:1-2, where we read:
Revelation 22:1-2
“Then the angel showed me the river of the water of life, bright as crystal, flowing from the throne of God and of the Lamb through the middle of the street of the city; also, on either side of the river, the tree of life with its twelve kinds of fruit, yielding its fruit each month. The leaves of the tree were for the healing of the nations.”
The tree of life was on either side of a river, which was flowing “through the middle of the street of the city”. Which city? The answer is given in Revelation 21:1-2:
“Then I saw a new heaven and a new earth, for the first heaven and the first earth had passed away, and the sea was no more. And I saw the holy city, new Jerusalem, coming down out of heaven from God, prepared as a bride adorned for her husband.”
So the tree of life is part of the new Jerusalem and therefore part of the future heaven and earth! Now connecting the dots: since the tree of life is in the paradise of God, is the paradise something present? NO! It will become present in the new earth! As Peter said:
2 Peter 3:13
“But according to his promise we are waiting for new heavens and a new earth in which righteousness dwells.”
The new heavens and the new earth, and thus also the paradise being part of the new earth, are things still to come. We are waiting for them! There is no paradise right now as the new earth to which it is part is still not there. But there will be! And in that paradise, in that new earth, in the Kingdom of God, we will see also the repented criminal, exactly as the Lord promised him that day:
“Assuredly I say to you today, you will be with me in paradise”
This is the right way to read this passage.

                       Kindle and paperback at Amazon

Monday, July 20, 2015

Did Abraham Lie?

Did Abraham Lie

It is so distressing to be taught by an eternal security teacher. Why? Because the bottom line in everything they declare about salvation security will downplay the seriousness of sinning somehow. To convince the listeners that one is forever saved, they will do anything they have to, which even includes smearing the Apostle Paul, as the worst of sinners (by a misuse of Rom. 7:14-25), to saying Abraham lied about Sarah, when he didn’t!
If you are acquainted with the misused Scriptures the perseverance of the saints people cite for support that the elect can stray into wickedness and remain therein, but still retain their salvation, then you know the Abraham lied declaration could arise. I have also noticed that they don’t readily cite a Scripture as proof for their Abraham lied teaching! One exists, but they don’t like to mention it! Let’s test their argument that Abraham lied, by going to the verse they misuse:
Abraham said of his wife Sarah, “She is my sister.” Then Abimelech king of Gerar sent for Sarah and took her. (Gen 20:2)
Did Abraham lie or is there more we need to know? The context reveals an important piece of related truth, which the Calvinists don’t want us to know about, which is found in verse 12. In that verse Abraham speaks about Sarah:
Besides, she really is my sister, the daughter of my father though not of my mother; and she became my wife. (Gen 20:12)
Sarah was both Abraham’s wife and sister! As Cain’s wife was also his sister, Abraham’s wife was his sister too. The once saved always saved people were looking for something to try to justify their own security in sin doctrine so they distorted the truth about Abraham to do so! But wait! There is more! The same people who are willing to smear Paul and Abraham also refer to Ananias and Sapphira, who lied to the Holy Spirit (Acts 5:1-10). They are cited, by the same spiritual wolves, as an example of the sin unto death, to say a person once saved can be struck dead physically by God in the state of unrepentant sin and will be taken to heaven! All their empty words will not change reality:
But the cowardly, the unbelieving, the vile, the murderers, the sexually immoral, those who practice magic arts, the idolaters and all LIARS–their place will be in the fiery lake of burning sulfur. This is the second death. (Rev 21:8)
ShareThis

About Eternal Life

Dedicated to proclaiming and defending the gospel of Jesus Christ without compromise. eternallifeblog@gmail.com

Got Questions (S. Michael Houdmann) Is NOT A Sound Source

Got Questions (S. Michael Houdmann) Is NOT A Sound Source

S. Michael Houdmann, the answer man behind Got Questions, teaches a license for immorality. S. Michael Houdmann of Got Questions teaches a license for immoralityWhile it might be true that S. Michael Houdmann has supplied thousands of answers to diverse questions, that doesn't mean his answers are always Biblically sound or spiritually wholesome, especially when related to various salvation issues. I assure you, from the perspective of the Bible, they are not! (Many cults, including the Jehovah's Witnesses, Church of Christ, etc. can answer questions also, but often supply a wrong answer too!)

s. michael houdmann
In brief, Got Questions is a very influential and answer-giving once saved always saved group, which has undoubtedly misinformed thousands of precious souls seeking God's truth. Got Questions misleading answers regarding salvation issues are spiritual poison sprinkled throughout its ministry.
Besides proclaiming/defending once saved always saved, Got Questions also denies repentance to be turning from sins (“What is repentance and is it necessary for salvation?”), the exact opposite of what Jesus taught it to be! NOTE: Jesus said the Ninevites repented at the preaching of Jonah (Mt. 12:41) and Jonah 3:10 shows the Ninvites turned from their sins. Hence, turning from sin is what Jesus said repentance is! End of discussion. S. Michael Houdmann is therefore wrong about how to come to initial salvation (get born again)! He deserves the Skull and Crossbones Award just for that, but there is more.
QUESTIONS For Got Questions

Confusion and Contradictions Reign

gotquestion.org s. michael houdmanngot questions
Got Questions is filled with doctrinal confusion and contradictions when dealing with the believer's security and his salvation,but not other issues such as opposing infant baptism or defending the deity of Christ! For him, salvation must be different and therefore a smoke and mirrors technique must be employed through his various double messages!
For example, one indirect contradiction is his view that a carnal Christian cannot act the same as unbelievers in continuous sin,but then he recommends Charles Ryrie's (and Charles Stanley's) books, which teach carnal Christians do act the same as unbelievers! Here's the proof. While writing on easy believism, S. Michael Houdmann wrote:
Those who continue to walk according to the flesh are not believers. This is why Paul exhorts us to “examine yourselves to see whether you are in the faith” (2 Corinthians 13:5). The “carnal” Christian who ereapxamines himself will soon see that he/she is not in the faith.... Is it possible that the new person Christ creates is one who continues to walk in the carnality of the flesh? It is not.
After that, the recommended resource he cites is So Great Salvation by Charles Ryrie. Note what Ryrie wrote:
Paul can only mean that these carnal Christians lived like unsaved men. That clarifies why the word carnal can label both unbelievers and believers, simply because the lifestyles of both are the same. (1989, ed, p. 62).
Hence, we have both confusion and a clear contradiction! So now I got a question for Got Questions: Which is wrong—S. Michael Houdmann as he teaches on easy believism or S. Michael Houdmann as he recommends Ryrie's teachings? NOTE: Got Questions also repeatedly misuses 2 Cor. 13:5. When Paul told that church group to examine themselves it was over doctrinenot their behavior:
Examine yourselves to see whether you are in the faith; test yourselves. Do you not realize that Christ Jesus is in you—unless, of course, you fail the test? (2 Cor 13:5)
S. Michael Houdmann also contradicts himself when he writes on Romans 7:14-25, a typical favorite of the grace-changingsecurity in sin teachers. Regarding that passage, S. Michael Houdmann says:
... Paul uses to describe himself. How can the greatest of the Apostles characterize himself, and by extension, all Christians, as “unspiritual,” a “slave to sin” and a “prisoner of the law of sin”?
As with other once saved always saved proponents who teach salvation can co-exist with adultery, murder, theft, lying, witchcraft, etc., Got Questions also teaches that the Romans 7 passage is referring to Christians! If it is as he says, and it really refers to normal Christian living (and Paul as a Christian), then all Christians continuously keep on doing evil acts as slaves to sin. Let me focus your attention especially on verse 19, which reads:
For what I do is not the good I want to do; no, the evil I do not want to do—this I keep on doing. (Rom 7:19)
The Greek tense is clear. It is a CONTINUOUS tense do evil! Again, if Romans 7:14-25 is the Christian life, then Paul and other Christians continuously do evil! That is a demonic distortion of the real image of a Christian. It is impossible to have salvation and act like that, according to Scripture:
We know that we have come to know him if we obey his commands. The man who says, “I know him,” but does not do what he commands is a liar, and the truth is not in him. (1 John 2:3,4)
And, once made perfect, he became the source of eternal salvation for all who obey him (Heb 5:9)
See also Romans 6. The eternal security teachers have dangerously mangled the saintly Christian image into a hollow and powerless form of godlinessThe truth is, Romans 7:14-25 is not the Christian life at all. Verse 18 is clear in stating it is the sinful nature which is referred to, and therefore not a Christian:
I know that nothing good lives in me, that is, in my sinful nature. For I have the desire to do what is good, but I cannot carry it out. (Rom 7:18)
S. Michael Houdmann also wrote:
Yes, Christians should turn from sin. Yes, Christians should commit their lives to obeying God (quoted from, What are the steps to salvation?)
But how is that possible? Remember, he just taught Rom. 7:14-25 refers to Paul as a Christian, who couldn't even do that, according to that passage! So, how could any Christian? See The Believer's Conditional Security pages 206-212 for much clear proof that Rom. 7:14-25 is not Paul or the normal Christian life. Don't be deceived by the grace changers.

Bible Questions Related To Salvation Security

S. Michael Houdmann's Sin Unto Death

Besides saying indirectly that Christians do evil continuously by teaching Rom. 7:19 is the Christian life, S. Michael Houdmann also teaches a license to sin under his distorted version of the sin unto death. Note the clarity of what he wrote:
The “sin unto death” is deliberate, willful, continuous, unrepentant sin. God, in His grace, allows His children to sin without immediately punishing them. However, there comes a point when God will no longer allow a believer to continue in unrepentant sin. When this point is reached, God sometimes decides to punish a Christian, even to the point of taking his or her life.
Got Questions again presents a dangerous false image of a Christian as a deliberate, willful, continuous, unrepentant EVIL doer! Contrast that to God's truth:
Dear children, do not let anyone lead you astray. He who does what is right is righteous, just as he is righteous. He who does what is sinful is of the devil.... (1 John 3:7,8)
We can obey God. We do not have to sin continuously. The truth is, S. Michael Houdmann (because of embracing once saved always saved) is presenting a person who is of the devil, as being a Christian! How dangerous is that? How heretical is that?

Folks, a real Christian is following Jesus now and putting God's word into practice (John 10:27; Lk. 8:21; etc.). The security in sin teachers want us to think the exact opposite of God's truth as they teach about the sin unto death, Rom. 7:14-25, David, etc.! That has to be the voice of the devil speaking through them as they repeat the essence of the devil's first lie to mankind, you will not surely die and thereby deny spiritual death as a possibility for the righteous. It isn't just S. Michael Houdmann, but all eternal security teachers!
As cited earlier, S. Michael Houdmann has a double message about salvation. Such is all through S. Michael Houdmann's poisoned answers on this subject. His inconsistencies are a sure sign of falsehood. Remember what Houdmann said about the sin unto death and how certain Christians continue in unrepentant sin:
The “sin unto death” is deliberate, willful, continuous, unrepentant sin.
His readers must be thoroughly confused, especially if they ever read his answer to: Will God continue to forgive you if you commit the same sin over and over again? Note, what S. Michael Houdmann wrote there!
...it must be noted that it is not biblical for a person to sin habitually and continually as a lifestyle and still be a believer.
So, which is right? Can a Christian (a believer) sin habitually and continually? Yes or no? Yes, if you go by his sin unto death answer, but no if you go by some of his other writings!

Dear reader, if you were in math class and the teacher taught 2+2=4, then at another time taught 2+2 =7, it would lead to mass confusion and an inability for the students to learn truth. It would also indicate the teacher's inability to teach math and hold such an office. As serious as that may be, this is much more serious than simple math. This will stretch into E-T-E-R-N-I-T-Y. Numerous examples could be cited to show how contradictory Got Questions is, but the following one makes the point well. It comes from his answer on How bad can a Christian sin:
Is a person who lives a life of continual sin a believer? No. When we become Christians, our lives will change. Anyone who is living a sinful lifestyle and claims to be a Christian is either lying, is self-deceived, or really is a believer who is going to experience God's judgment and discipline.
Confused by that? You should be! He is consistently inconsistent when dealing with salvation. Of course, S. Michael Houdmann would have to believe it is possible for a Christian to sin continually, because of his doctrine. It is basic that all license for immorality teachers like him think David remained saved while in adultery and murder! That implies there are Christian adulterers and Christian murderers, in contrast to Rev. 21:8 and 1 Cor. 6:9,10.

got questions

I Got Questions For Got Questions

(1) Why don't you just consistently tell everyone you believe a Christian can commit adultery, murder, disown Jesus, steal, lie, swindle, practice witchcraft, etc. and safely remain on the road to heaven, since he was once saved?

(2) Do you realize the salvation doctrine you embrace and teach to others is an attempt to mock God by indirectly saying one can sow to please his flesh and still reap eternal life?
Do not be deceived: God cannot be mocked. A man reaps what he sows. The one who sows to please his sinful nature, from that nature will reap destruction; the one who sows to please the Spirit, from the Spirit will reap eternal life. Let us not become weary in doing good, for at the proper time we will reap a harvest if we do not give up. (Gal 6:7-9).
(3) Are you willing to turn away from teaching such doctrinal poison for your own soul's sake and for the good of your readers?

S. Michael Houdmann vs Dan Corner Eternal Security Debate
Which Never Occurred

S. Michael Houdmann was contacted to debate me on eternal security and he flatly declined as almost all others like him have. His response (excuse) was:
Yes, I am fairly familiar with the EO [Evangelical Outreach] site. I find your material on Catholicism, Mormons, JWs, Sabbatarians, baptismal regeneration, etc., to be quite good and helpful.
I have to respectfully decline your invitation to debate. Again, if Dan Corner approaches this issue from the perspective that eternal security is a lie from the pit of hell, straight from the lips of the devil, and that anyone who teaches eternal security is an unsaved false teacher - I do not see how we could possibly have a productive and respectful dialogue.
Dan Corner has engaged in countless debates on this issue, similar to what you are proposing here. Have any of them resulted in anyone's mind being changed? This issue has been hotly debated for 400 years. Dan Corner and I debating will not solve the disagreement or end the debate.
        Sincerely in Christ,
        S. Michael Houdmann

While it is certainly true that I do view the doctrine of once saved always saved (which is the same as eternal security or the perseverance of the saints) as a lie from the pit of hell and the eternal security teachers as unsaved teachers (since I am in full agreement with Jude and 2 Peter 2, among other reasons), that is not a solid reason not to debate. Doesn't S. Michael Houdmann likewise believe the same about me and my doctrine on salvation?
NOTE: S. Michael Houdmann views all NO Eternal Security Christians who reject once saved always saved as maintaining our own salvation by our own good works and efforts. Below is what he wrote in, Is eternal security a “license" to sin?”
Any denial of eternal security is, in its essence, a belief that we must maintain our own salvation by our own good works and efforts. This is completely antithetical to salvation by grace.
Doesn't that imply that all NO Eternal Security Christians are unsaved and teaching antithetical to grace, from his dark perspective? Yes, it does! So why is he so concerned about what we have stated concerning people like him? He believes the same way about us, since one can't have salvation apart from God's grace.

S. Michael Houdmann is also guilty of misrepresenting people like us. We don't teach antithetical to Biblical grace at all. The following is what we believe at Evangelical Outreach and it is entirely Biblical:
We believe that we are saved by grace (Eph. 2:8,9) but we can fall from grace (Gal. 5:2-4). We are justified by faith (Rom. 5:1) but our faith can become shipwrecked (1 Tim. 1:19,20) and cease to exist (Lk. 8:13; Rom. 11:19-23). We are not under the law (Rom. 6:14,15) but if you live according to the sinful nature you will die (Rom. 8:13). Paul taught against legalism (Gal. 5:3,4) but he also taught that no immoral, impure or greedy person has any inheritance in the kingdom of Christ and of God (Eph. 5:5-7). We are not saved by works (Eph. 2:8,9) but to reap eternal life and not destruction you must sow to please the Spirit and not the sinful nature (Gal. 6:8,9). God is faithful to us (1 Jn. 1:9; 1 Cor. 10:13) but we must be faithful to him to the very end of our lives to escape the lake of fire or second death (Rev. 2:10,11). God surely loves us (Jn. 3:16; Mk. 10:21; Rom. 8:35-39) but those who inherit the kingdom of God love God (Jam 2:5; 1 Cor. 2:9) and to love God means to obey his commands (Jn. 14:15; 1 Jn. 5:3). We have freedom in Christ (Gal. 5:1) but this freedom is not to indulge the sinful nature (Gal. 5:13; 1 Pet 2:16).
Once saved always saved is a dangerous snare to precious souls. The sooner Christians recognize it and fight against it the better it will be for all concerned. Compromise with such dangerous teachers is spiritual treason.

Final Nails in the Coffin Of Got Questions

S. Michael Houdmann teaches a severely confused double message regarding salvation, but his beliefs are often well camouflaged with his verbiage and double talk. He wants it both ways and, therefore, terribly contradicts himself to his own harm and the harm and confusion of his readers. These are undeniable facts, as the aforementioned proves, and that also reflects his false teachings regarding salvation. Simple logic declares no one can teach contradictions without error.

It is impossible to teach true Biblical holiness and obedience as an expression of saving faith in the Lord Jesus, if one believes in the damnable heresy and doctrine of demons called eternal security. Why? Because the latter denies and contradicts the former especially when backsliding occurs. Eternal security allows for unrepentant wickedness and salvation simultaneously. As hard as S. Michael Houdmann tried to deny and hide that fact, his doctrine is a license for immorality!
I have nothing personal against S. Michael Houdmann, but he deserves our Skull And Crossbones Award. It is his false grace and demonic doctrine which repulses me and needs to be combated. S. Michael Houdmann, I remain willing to debate you on eternal security.


Got Questions and S. Michael Houdmann
Skull And Crossbones Awards For False Prophets And False Teachers
Assurance Of Salvation
Former Roman Catholic
Latter Day Saints (Witnessing To Mormons)
Bible Answers To Bible Questions
Near Death Experiences

Evangelical Outreach
PO Box 265
Washington, PA 15301

EvangelicalOutreach.org
EternalLifeBlog.com

Contact Evangelical Outreach or Join Our Internet Church

Sunday, July 19, 2015

We Are Righteous or Unrighteous - Which Are You?

Righteous or Unrighteous – Which?

Simply stated, you are either righteous or unrighteous in God’s sight. You are either godly and pure hearted with eternal life or ungodly with an impure heart and without eternal life. All through the bible we read of righteous people by name. Furthermore, there are many promises and warnings given to righteous people. The same can be said of the unrighteous. Then we come to a lone but magnified verse, found in the so-called Romans Road To Salvation plan which has shaped people’s theology. It seems to say the exact opposite!king david sinned false teachers That verse has been heard so many times by misinformed people, who have read very little of the Bible, that they actually think it even applies to Christians! That verse is Rom. 3:10:

This Is Why The Roman’s Road Salvation Plan Is Flawed
As it is written: “There is no one righteous, not even one.”
The view that Christians are not righteous beautifully fits the apostate theology which also smears Paul as the worst of sinners, that is, eternal security. So we now have multitudes of professing Christians believing that they themselves are NOT righteous in one breath, then professing Christ is their righteousness sin another breath, but see no contradiction! It is a sad day, with glaring contradictions, but as long as it presents salvation security in sin, then it must be okay to them. People love it and will support the wolves teaching such poison to the damnation of SOULS.

The Context

The context of Romans 3:10 explicitly shows much more than most have been taught!
As it is written: “There is no one righteous, not even one; there is no one who understands, no one who seeks God. All have turned away, they have together become worthless; there is no one who does good, not even one. Their throats are open graves; their tongues practice deceit. The poison of vipers is on their lips. Their mouths are full of cursing and bitterness. Their feet are swift to shed blood; ruin and misery mark their ways, and the way of peace they do not know. There is no fear of God before their eyes.” (Rom 3:10-18)
The subjects, who all are not righteous:
  • are without spiritual understanding
  • don’t seek God
  • have turned away
  • became worthless
  • there is none who do good
  • their throats are open graves
  • their tongues practice deceit
  • their words are spiritual poison
  • they are full of cursing and bitterness
  • they are swift to shed blood
  • ruin and misery mark their way
  • the way of peace they do not know
  • there is no fear of God in them

God Sees The Wicked This Way

That is not the description of a Christian, one who follows Jesus (Jn. 10:27) and puts God’s word into practice (Lk. 8:21). Such a true Christian is righteous:
Dear children, do not let anyone lead you astray. He who does what is right is righteous, just as he is righteous. He who does what is sinful is of the devil… (1 John 3:7,8)
There we see the two types of people being either righteous or of the devil. The basic truths of 1 John 3:7,8 need to be pondered until it becomes unshakable in your theology. If you are a Christian, you are righteous. If you are of the majority, you are unrighteous (and of the devil). ONLY the righteous will go to eternal life, while the unrighteous will not inherit God’s kingdom:
Then they will go away to eternal punishment, but the righteous to eternal life. (Mat 25:46)

Righteous David Turned To Evil

But is it once righteous, always righteous? NEVER! Notice what happens when a righteous person backslides, as King David did:
If a righteous man turns from his righteousness and does evil, he will die for it. (Ezek 33:18)
If there were no righteous people, how could a warning like this be found in the bible? It would be irrelevant, but it is very appropriate and desperately needs to be known!Scripture pointedly warns the righteous that a DEATH is awaiting them, if they turn to evil. QUESTION: How did King David “die” when he turned to evil (Ezek. 33:18)? He died, because he turned to evil, but how? It wasn’t physical death, because he continued to live. It was spiritual death, the same thing that happened to Adam and Eve, as God warned in Gen. 2:16,17 and which the devil boldly denied in Gen. 3:4. That is the exact model and example laid before us with the ETERNAL SECURITY TEACHERS and all who deny that about David. They act just like their father, the devil and boldly deny just like he did, that there is spiritual death for the righteous who turn to evil; but as with Adam and Eve that didn’t stop spiritual death from occurring. They still died, as David did, when he turned to evil. That righteous man became spiritually DEAD and LOST, like the prodigal when he backslid (Lk. 15:24).

More Details About King David’s Sin

KNOW THIS: A righteous man can become unrighteous again. A saved man can become lost again. A spiritually alive man can become spiritually dead again. To deny these truths won’t change anything. Not a single thing. They remain fact regardless who likes it or not. To be warned about that is to be guarded. To be deceived about that is to be easy prey, thus reflecting the DANGER of false teachers!

More Truth About Eternal Security Teachers Here

ShareThis

About Eternal Life

Dedicated to proclaiming and defending the gospel of Jesus Christ without compromise. eternallifeblog@gmail.com
This entry was posted in Righteous Or Unrighteous - Which and tagged ,. Bookmark the permalink.

Friday, July 17, 2015

Following the Lord or going away? - Anastasios Kioulachoglou

Following the Lord or going away?

It was a full of action day. Jesus had just fed thousands, using only five loaves and two fishes. After this miracle, in John 6:15 we read:
John 6:15
"Therefore when Jesus perceived that they were about to come and take Him by force to make Him king, He departed again to the mountain by Himself alone."
They wanted to make Him king! In verse 26 however, the Lord reveals their motives:
"Most assuredly, I say to you, you seek Me, not because you saw the signs, but because you ate of the loaves and were filled."
They didn’t seek Him for the miracles but because they ate and were filled. Many people follow the Lord for the same reason, because "they ate and were filled". However, once the loaves disappear, once "tribulation or persecution arises for the Word’s sake, immediately they fall away" (Mark 4:16-17). Yes, they are ready to make him king, but they don’t have root in the faith, as - we will see it later - those folks of John 6 didn’t have either. Of course, the Lord gives abundant blessings in every field of life. Yet, there would also be periods of trial of the faith, of "persecution or tribulation for the Word". Those who have faith will stay while those who are only temporal, that just ate the loaves and seek Him for the loaves, will go away.
So they would take Him and make Him a king. Somebody may ask, "that would be great. Why Jesus lost this opportunity? He would be declared exactly what He truly was." So while the multitude was full and joyful, the Lord left and went to the mountain "BY HIMSELF ALONE". He left from the noise and the vain expectations of these people and went to the mountain ALONE.
"when the people therefore saw that Jesus was not there, nor His disciples, they also got into boats and came to Capernaum, seeking Jesus."
The multitude being full was running to find Jesus. Like in election where some voters are running behind the politicians that promise more - more loaves, more prosperity - so did they. They were rushing behind the Lord because they were filled. "What miracles are you telling me? What teachings? I follow you because you can increase my welfare. You can give me more things, better things, bigger things." They were seeking him everywhere. When however they found him, He reproved them. It is not the perishable you should put your attention on but the non-perishable, the eternal life (John 6:27). And there a conversation starts:
John 6:28-34
"Then they said to Him, "What shall we do, that we may work the works of God?" Jesus answered and said to them, "This is the work of God, that you believe in Him whom He sent." Therefore they said to Him, "What sign will You perform then, that we may see it and believe You? What work will You do? "Our fathers ate the manna in the desert; as it is written, He gave them bread from heaven to eat." Then Jesus said to them, "Most assuredly, I say to you, Moses did not give you the bread from heaven, but My Father gives you the true bread from heaven. "For the bread of God is He who comes down from heaven and gives life to the world." Then they said to Him, "Lord, give us this bread always."
Then the Lord explains to them that HE is the bread of life and that it is the Father’s will "of all He has given Me I should lose nothing, but should raise it up at the last day", He said.
"The Jews then complained about Him, because He said, "I am the bread which came down from heaven." And they said, "Is not this Jesus, the son of Joseph, whose father and mother we know? How is it then that He says, I have come down from heaven?"
and in verse 52
"The Jews therefore quarrelled among themselves, saying, "How can this Man give us His flesh to eat?"
From following him in multitudes, once they heard His Word, the same people who had eaten from His hands the previous day, the same people who had taken the ship seeking him, and who wanted to make him king, "complained about Him". When somebody follows the Lord for wrong reasons, he may call Him Lord and King but when the things do not turn up as he desires, then the Lord becomes "this". Jesus obviously was not fitting to what they thought. Thus, instead of changing their view, they left. Verse 60 tells us:
"Therefore many of His disciples, when they heard this, said, "This is a hard saying; who can hear it?"
The complaint did not pass unnoticed from the Lord, who explained:
"Does this offend you? "What then if you should see the Son of Man ascend where He was before? "It is the Spirit who gives life; the flesh profits nothing. The words that I speak to you are spirit, and they are life. "But there are some of you who do not believe." For Jesus knew from the beginning who they were who did not believe, and who would betray Him."
Is it possible that though they had seen so many miracles they didn’t believe? As it seems, it is. The whatever faith they had was like the one of the second category of the parable of the sower ("they believe for a little and in time of temptation they fall away" (Luke 8:13). "How is it possible Jesus to say such hard things?" they murmured. "Come on Jesus, tell something lighter that the multitudes can accept." And verse 66 tells us:
"From that time many of His disciples went back and walked with Him no more."
It was not one or two the disciples that did this. As the Word says many chose to go back and not follow Him any longer. The multitudes leave therefore, and together many of the disciples. However the Lord does not run behind them to explain the misunderstanding. He knows that in order to stay with Him they have to have the right reasons. And then He turns to the twelve:
"Then Jesus said to the twelve, "Do you also want to go away?"
"Do you also want to go away?" The Lord didn’t keep (and does not keep) anybody compulsory. He had invested so much to these people. He had given them power. He had given them authority. They made miracles. He had opened His heart to them. He had called them His friends. However He didn’t control them and He does not control anybody. He wants us with Him not only because He wants it but also because you want it too. "Do you also want to go?" And here comes Peter to give Him the right answer:
"But Simon Peter answered Him, "Lord, to whom shall we go? You have the words of eternal life. "Also we have come to believe and know that You are the Christ, the Son of the living God."
Let this be the answer and let these be the reasons for which we follow the Lord. Only those who believe that He has words of eternal life AND HAVE BELIEVED AND KNOW THAT HE IS THE MESSIAH, THE SON OF THE LIVING GOD will not go away but will follow Him constantly, up to the end.

                       Kindle and paperback at Amazon